Categories: Uncategorized

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Hears Case Regarding Same-sex Couple and Their Child’s Birth Certificate

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments last week after the State of Indiana appealed a federal judge’s ruling that permitted same-sex couples to list both names on their child’s birth certificate. In June 2016, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana issued a decision allowing the placement of both females in a same-sex marriage on their child’s birth certificate. Prior to this ruling, the State of Indiana permitted only the listing of a mother and a father on a birth certificate. As a result, in the case of female married same-sex couples, only the woman who carried the child could be listed as the child’s parent on the birth certificate. The child was considered born out of wedlock, and the spouse needed to adopt the child to become a legal parent.  The Court held that Indiana’s refusal to recognize two mothers on a birth certificate violated the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, because the State did not extend equal rights to married same-sex couples. After the decision was issued, the State of Indiana began placing both married same-sex parents’ names on their children’s birth certificates, which was a very progressive step that continues to provide a great benefit to our married same-sex clients.

During the oral arguments, Indiana Solicitor General Thomas Fisher argued that Indiana law only provides parental rights through biology or adoption, and contended that the district court’s decision created a third category that “creates inequality and undermines the rights of the biological fathers.”  Meanwhile, the attorney representing the plaintiffs, Karen Celestino-Horseman, responded that Indiana law does not treat married same-sex couples and married heterosexual couples equally. For example, the law treats female spouses of women who underwent artificial insemination differently than male spouses of women in the same scenario, as the male spouse would be the presumed legal father of the child under Indiana law.  The Seventh Circuit frequently alluded to biology during the oral arguments, with Judge Diane S. Skyes stating, “You can’t overcome biology and if the state defines parenthood by biology, no argument under Equal Protection Clause of the substantive due process clause can overcome that.”  Celestino-Horseman countered that parenthood is no longer defined by biology.

The Seventh Circuit is taking the case under advisement and will make a ruling at a later date. We are hopeful that the Seventh Circuit makes a decision that accords equal rights to married-same sex couples, and continues to allow both parents to be listed on their children’s birth certificates in the State of Indiana.  Stay tuned to our blog for more updates on this case.

The attorneys of Harden Jackson Law are devoted to servicing clients in all areas of family law, including divorce, custody, child support, property division, paternity, post-divorce modifications, prenuptial and postnuptial agreements, simple wills, adoption, surrogacy, and other areas of reproductive law. For more information, please contact us at (317) 569-0770 or www.hardenjacksonlaw.com.

Remember, these blog posts are not meant to be legal advice. You should consult an attorney to discuss the specifics of your situation.

Harden Jackson Law LLC

Recent Posts

Israel to Hear Arguments on Surrogacy for Same-Sex Couples

While surrogacy is not legal in many parts of the world, there are also countries,…

7 years ago

New Hope for Foster Care

Adoption is an excellent form of creating a family for those affected by infertility. This…

7 years ago

Celebrity Surrogacy Update!

Many people know Cristiano Ronaldo from his excellent soccer skills, but few know he just…

7 years ago

Michele Jackson and Katherine Schwartz to Present CLE at Indiana State Bar Association Brown Bag Series

Michele Jackson and Katherine Schwartz will present the CLE “Hoosier Baby? An Intro to Assisted…

7 years ago

Large Companies Increasing Fertility Benefits

Social media site, Pinterest, recently added adoption and surrogacy benefits for its 500 employees. Pinterest’s…

7 years ago

Nevada Updates Surrogacy and Adoption Laws

Nevada recently passed a new law that significantly improves surrogacy and adoption laws in the…

7 years ago